<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Virtualization Information - Latest Comments</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.disqus.com/</link><description>Vitualization and all things tech</description><atom:link href="https://virtualizationinformation.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:19:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-622346067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm primarily running servers on mine, so I hadn't tried it. I know that &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/wygtya" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://twitter.com/wygtya"&gt;http://twitter.com/wygtya&lt;/a&gt; is running it as well. I'll echo out your question on twitter. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:19:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SRM, Certificates and vSphere Replication</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/srm-certificates-and-sphere-replication/#comment-622343640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The admin guide has the upgrade steps. I believe if you do an reinstall from the admin guide steps  you can point to the new certificate. It could be smoother, for sure. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SRM, Certificates and vSphere Replication</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/srm-certificates-and-sphere-replication/#comment-621959194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You mentioned "There is a process for replacing them on existing SRM installations." We are trying to replace our SRM certificates and cannot find any documentation on the process.  The certificates are created and ready but I want to make sure they are uploaded correctly and that the joining process will go smoothly.  Do you have any advice?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">PSmith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:55:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Address Steve Wozniak&amp;#8217;s Cloud Concerns &amp;#8211; Just Win, Baby</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/how-to-address-steve-wozniaks-cloud-concerns-just-win-baby/#comment-612612241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Rick for the comments. It seems that providers don't really discuss or at least highlight the 9's of availability to expect, so the default expectation is "all the time" availability which isn't realistic.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:47:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Address Steve Wozniak&amp;#8217;s Cloud Concerns &amp;#8211; Just Win, Baby</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/how-to-address-steve-wozniaks-cloud-concerns-just-win-baby/#comment-612609022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article Shannon - I'd agree with most of what is said here. The trust level is "getting there" but with some of those recent outages it does have folks concerned. Still, there are other great use cases for public cloud services that supplement current infrastructure. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rick Schlander (@vmrick)</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:43:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Microsoft MDOP Virtualization Licensing Reflects their Software as a Service Support</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/microsoft-mdop-virtualizaiton-licensing-reflects-their-software-as-a-service-path/#comment-602855475</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article….!!!Nice to know about new&lt;br&gt;things with helping concept. I am almost brand new to blogging and really like&lt;br&gt;your post, it is really on target! Thanks for all of your time &amp;amp; work. Hope&lt;br&gt;you always write this blog. &lt;br&gt;Thank you, &lt;br&gt;The given information is very effective.&lt;br&gt;I’ll keep update with the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.djavatechnologies.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.djavatechnologies.com"&gt;website designing&lt;/a&gt;                &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jyoti Awasthi</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 06:34:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-589363854</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No drops. It's been really stable since the change. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:06:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-589228062</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any updates since setting the vNICs to hard settings? I've bailed on running ESXi natively and now run it in Fusion with no issues but would like to go back if I know it's going to work under load. Thx. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zghauri</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 10:02:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Installing Certificates for vCenter and SRM to Work</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/installing-certificates-for-vcenter-and-srm-to-work/#comment-574730435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Happy to do it. The fewer surprises the better on installations. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:04:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Installing Certificates for vCenter and SRM to Work</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/installing-certificates-for-vcenter-and-srm-to-work/#comment-574279809</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Daren&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dgray</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:57:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SRM, Certificates and vSphere Replication</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/srm-certificates-and-sphere-replication/#comment-572628951</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article! Thanks for the mention &amp;amp; link to my post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke @ThepHuck</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:14:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-561358603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;None so far. I'll start pushing it a bit harder in the next couple of weeks to see if it will break. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:18:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-561358139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've had 5-8 VMs running concurrently on it so far. I've just been trying to get it stable for a period of time, then measure performance. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-561095331</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any drops since pre 6/14 nic change? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc v</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-558969323</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have seen this happen with other 2011 mac mins where you need to manually set the nic to full duplex 1000 when connected to a Cisco SG 200-50 gigabit switch.  I hope your fix takes care of the issue - keep us posted.  Thanks!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a side note - how is the performance when it is running?  How many VMs do you have working at any give time?  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marc v</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 21:33:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-554303435</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been able to get them going by resetting the network settings from the DCUI, but I'll try unplugging and plugging it in to see if we at least have a behavior pattern. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 07:44:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ESXi 5 on Mac Mini  &amp;#8211; First Problem (with update)</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/esxi-5-on-mac-mini-first-problem/#comment-554081026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have two mac minis that exhibit the exact same behavior. I use them to demo vC Ops and to put load on them, I run VMmark but they don't last long.  Once they drop off, the only semi-tolerable solution seems to be to pop the cable in and out and reconnect. Really need to sort this out to get any value out of this setup. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">zghauri1</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VMware SRM and Zerto Data Replication: The Art of Disaster Recovery</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/vmware-srm-and-zerto-data-replication-the-art-of-disaster-recovery/#comment-458308416</link><description>&lt;p&gt;From the technical standpoint, Zerto utilizes host-based replication so it doesn't require array-based replication at all. SRM 5 also has host-based replication, but Zerto has more capability as far as lower Recovery Time Objective (RTO) (it can be a matter of seconds) where SRM 5 is limited to 15 minute minimum RTO.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there is an HA event, SRM host-based replication requires a complete re-sync once the VM is restarted on another server in the cluster. With Zerto, this is not necessary. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:15:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VMware SRM and Zerto Data Replication: The Art of Disaster Recovery</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/vmware-srm-and-zerto-data-replication-the-art-of-disaster-recovery/#comment-456033763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"&lt;br&gt;Although you can use SRM’s Virtual Replication when you don’t have array-based replication, Zerto is the one I recommend." I'd like to understand your reasoning for this - technical and non technical. Can you please elaborate?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sara</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 12:16:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do We Really Need VMware Mobile Virtualization Platform (MVP)  VMworld 2011 Update &amp;#8211; (Now Called Horizon Mobile)?</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/do-we-really-need-vmware-mobile-virtualization-platform-mvp/#comment-228768291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Christian. It was great to meet you by the way. Like I said, I'd be happy to talk to any of the VMware MVP team to give them a chance to discuss their ideas of it's use case. In many ways, MVP reminds me of VMware's ACE product. In theory, ACE is a good idea, but other products like View and ThinApp pretty much have displaced that product. Further, VMware is acquiring so many products they are, in effect, competing with themselves. Why would I virtualize Zimbra on MVP when I already have a Zimbra client on my iPhone or Android device? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 20:47:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Field Day: Some Take Away Thoughts</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/tech-field-day-some-take-away-thoughts/#comment-224940933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Same here Tom. Absolutely will bring the good stuff next time.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shannonsnowden</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tech Field Day: Some Take Away Thoughts</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/tech-field-day-some-take-away-thoughts/#comment-224916121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;it was a honor meeting you Shannon.  here to the next time and this time remember the bourbon ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Howarth</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:46:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xen on ARM 9 Processor=Xen on a PDA</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/xen-on-arm-9-processorxen-on-a-pda/#comment-194867550</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Xen ARM activity getting led by Samsung continues to advance a Xen hypervisor band-aid for the ARM 9 processor family. Samsung has approved this band-aid at the accomplished few Xen Summit contest and continues to ensure the project's movement forward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dealsbell.com/store/toshiba/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.dealsbell.com/store/toshiba/"&gt;toshiba coupon codes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">peternakah</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 15:49:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Weekly Twitter Updates</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/weekly-twitter-updates-27/#comment-160420401</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It also developed a "Sabbath Manifesto" smart phone app that reminds people when to shut off their devices, and updates their Facebook and Twitter accounts with a notice that they're signing off. Lots of apps allow users to "check in" to locations,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brisbane seo</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 06:53:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Turnkey Linux Virtual Appliances &amp;#8211; 10 minutes to Mediawiki</title><link>http://virtualizationinformation.com/turnkey-linux-virtual-appliances-10-minutes-to-mediawiki/#comment-138681404</link><description>&lt;p&gt;actually, adding repos ended up being more of a hassle than doing it shannon's way. got it to work in minutes. excellent article!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Guest</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 04:04:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>